Torzon Decisions Every choice this involves, with what each option costs you

Torzon addresses

Nine published addresses for one market. Copy rather than retype. Which one to use is a decision with a page of its own.

torzon4v7bcakvo7qikdfknewj4dlr44hkyv4jyfrkl7ci3zqn76kiid.onion
atmqbitgx7g5c4gdc4t23erlpvub7c3agbmky6on6vxcfs26fuj3usqd.onion
dgkozv5myc3lfpedjl2khhk6icok2xm5wmc5vg42xvbyh4fs345mopyd.onion
evwigej45n3nywbn3aqdun4o6cgjyfgxf2ts7lm6no3uotxanpeuosad.onion
fr6bvsrcx7ajxou7kyme5otctzdmpllum6iqootcjnwmzepuuams2tad.onion
h3h66vql4ucodjre4bluwtywhoq2bjqxpgvxgv2xo2nkui5ney6gslqd.onion
jcyjjcu4oocqkgxyq4d6mmbuuha5db7iz3zifhf2cm6n6m5mvogxwqyd.onion
ncmebasolcj2pmw5oy2bco4r65jbcqznrujtxcalz6e2b2jmhjlf44ad.onion
otw35cxf2rssl23tsvtqjwj32u62q4becl2jmgvekuemptxli7gt5lyd.onion

This list is published, not monitored. An address that opens is not an address that is genuine, and checking a signature is the only thing that settles it.

Start › The decisions

Help somebody else or not

More common than anyone admits, and it goes wrong in a specific way: the helper ends up holding the risk.

Explain, and touch nothing

What you gain
The risk stays where the decisions are being made, and they build habits that work when you are not there.
What you give up
Slower, and it requires them to be willing to learn.
Suits
Anyone helping anybody.

Set it up for them

What you gain
Fast, and it gets somebody past a barrier they would not have crossed.
What you give up
Your machine did the setup and your network carried it. The account is theirs and the trail is yours.
Suits
Nobody, however reasonable each individual shortcut seems.

Decline

What you gain
No exposure, and no responsibility for decisions you will not be present for.
What you give up
Somebody may go and do it with no precautions at all.
Suits
Anyone asked by a person unwilling to do the setup themselves.

Where the exposure lands

When you set something up for another person, the account is theirs and the reconstruction is around you. Your machine, your network, and usually your wallet the first time. If anything is ever pieced together, they appear nowhere in it.

Nobody plans this. It happens because helping is easier than teaching, and each shortcut is reasonable on its own. Doing it once on your machine is faster than talking somebody through it. Funding it once from your wallet is faster than explaining acquisition. Then it is a habit.

The line worth keepingThe clean line: you can explain anything and hold nothing. The moment you hold credentials, keys or funds for another person, their decisions become your exposure.

Teaching it instead

  1. They install the client on their machine and check the installer signature. If they will not do this part, nothing after it is worth doing.
  2. They establish the fingerprint themselves. Do not hand them yours, because a fingerprint accepted from a person is a fingerprint accepted on trust, which is the habit you are trying to prevent.
  3. They copy the address and run the check. Watch, correct, do not touch the keyboard.
  4. They set the password and store the recovery material. You should never see either.
  5. They fund it themselves. The step most often shortcut and the one that decides where the trail leads.

What tips it

Whether they will do the setup. Somebody unwilling to spend an hour on parts with no visible payoff will skip verification later, when it is inconvenient, and the consequences of that land on whoever helped them. That is not a moral judgement, it is that you cannot supply somebody else with judgement, and mechanics without judgement is the combination that produces the worst outcomes.